it's just sensationalist news reporting, the way the news is talking about it is completely 100% predictable.
Almost every article says that he used an "assault rifle", or some variant. What the hell does that mean?
"Military style rifle". Fact: almost every weapon the military uses can be bought legally if you want to be fingerprinted.
Body armor isn't like a magically shield. And most stuff isn't guaranteed to stop more than even a few rounds of small caliber pistol. Even just one shot would've still hurt like ****, and would've slowed him down.
At least 192 million firearms in America. So 191,999,997 were not involved in a shooting spree murder at a movie theater today.
2010 there was 8775 murders with firearms. So worst case scenario is .00457% chance that a firearm will be used to murder someone. It's been estimated on the high end that 1 out of 4 Americans own firearms, and that the average gun owner owns 4 firearms.
This would make it actually more like .0025% or 2.5 firearms out of every 100,000.
Hope I did my math correctly